Approximate Public Exposure Periods for DQC Rules and Guidance
  • April 15 - May 31
  • July 15 - August 31
  • November 15- December 31

Public review and comment is a critical part of the process of improving the usability of XBRL filed with the SEC. Generally, rules are considered for approval within 45 days of the close of public exposure for comment, and should be implemented in all filings within 90 days of approval.

During the Public Review period for version 29 the Data Quality Committee seeks comment on ten automated checks for US GAAP filers and one additional check for IFRS filers, as well as updates to rules for filers using the US GAAP and IFRS taxonomies, from Monday, December 8 through Thursday, January 22, 2026.

The latest compiled rule releases and reference implementation code are linked at right. These resources can be used with Arelle - the free, open source XBRL processor - and the XULE rules engine. See the schedule in the inset box for approximate public exposure period timing.

For each rule or guidance item listed below, click the title to review its comprehensive documentation. To post your comments, you will need to login and agree to Terms and Conditions for Public Comments. Comments received can be reviewed without logging in.

When providing feedback about guidance or a rule, please consider the following:

  • What is the concern with the proposed rule? Please be as specific as possible and include examples using data submitted to the SEC.
  • How should the rule be revised?
  • How does the revision to the rule improve the usability of the data?

Use this link for general feedback on all rules and guidance.

Public Exposure of Validation Rules & Guidance - RSS

Comments on the 11 rules below are due by Thursday, January 22 2026:

DQC_0208

US GAAP

Subtotals match Extensible Enumerations in the Schedule of Investments

The purpose of Rule DQC_0208 is to ensure that any extensible enumeration value reported for the investment type and industry type is properly used as a member on the InvestmentTypeAxis and EquitySecuritiesByIndustryAxis.


DQC_0209

US GAAP

Missing Extensible Enumeration Elements on the Schedule of Investments

The purpose of Rule DQC_0209 is to ensure that all required extensible enumeration elements, such as InvestmentIndustrySectorExtensibleEnumeration, are properly reported in the Schedule of Investments (SOI).


DQC_0218

US GAAP

Missing InvestmentIssuerAffiliationExtensibleEnumeration on the Schedule of Investments

The purpose is to ensure that the required extensible enumeration element, InvestmentIssuerAffiliationExtensibleEnumeration, is properly reported in the Schedule of Investments (SOI).


DQC_0224

IFRS

Management Defined Performance Measure Reconciliation Accuracy

The purpose is to ensure the mathematical accuracy of management-defined performance measure (MPM) reconciliations in IFRS filings. The rule validates that the sum of the IFRS base measure and all reconciling adjustments equals the reported management-defined performance measure value.


DQC_0225

US GAAP

Prohibited Recognition and Derecognition Items on Income Statement

The purpose is to ensure that certain recognition and derecognition concepts that represent changes in instant balances (rather than changes in retained earnings) do not appear as line items on the income statement or comprehensive income statement.


DQC_0226

US GAAP

US GAAP Elements Used in Employee Benefit Plan Filings

The purpose is to ensure that Employee Benefit Plan (EBP) filings do not inappropriately use US GAAP elements. EBP filings (forms 11-K, 11-K/A, and 11-KT) should use specialized Employee Benefit Plan taxonomy elements rather than standard US GAAP elements.


DQC_0227

US GAAP

Calculated Ratio Consistency Checks

The purpose is to verify that reported calculated ratio concepts (for example, percentages and per-share metrics) are consistent with their underlying numerator and denominator facts.


DQC_0228

US GAAP

‘Other’ Concept Should Not Exceed Aggregate

The purpose is to ensure that an “other” concept used in a calculation does not report a value larger than the aggregate (non-other) concept it is intended to roll up into. In well-formed calculation networks, an “other” member (a partial grouping) should not exceed the value of the total aggregation concept.


DQC_0229

US GAAP

Multiple ‘Other’ Concepts in a Calculation Network

The purpose is to ensure that an aggregate (calculation total) does not include more than one distinct “other” concept in the same calculation network. Some calculation networks can inadvertently include multiple “other” concepts for the same parent total (for example, both OtherAssetsMember and OtherCurrentAssetsMember included under the same total).


DQC_0230

US GAAP

Disallowed ‘Other’ Concepts in Calculation Networks

The purpose is to ensure that calculation (summation) networks use only the allowed “other” concepts for a given calculated concept. Some taxonomies define an “other” concept that aggregates items not explicitly listed as children of the total; this rule checks that only the expected “other” concepts are used in each calculation network.


DQC_0231

US GAAP

Aggregate and ‘Other’ Concepts Appearing as Siblings in Calculation Networks

The purpose is to detect cases where an aggregate concept and its designated “other” concept appear together as siblings in the same calculation (summation) network. In well-formed calculation linkbases, the “other” concept is intended to represent amounts that roll up into the aggregate (or act as a complementary grouping) and should not be listed as a sibling alongside the aggregate in the same network.



Comment